Peter Flynn
My feedback
4 results found
-
56 votes
Hi All -
We're currently working on allowing users to split ideas apart. This will be useful in several cases:
(1) A user creates an idea that is really two separate things, and they should be tracked for interest accordingly.
(2) Your team seeks clarity on a couple of different interpretations of the idea, both of which could be good ideas.
(3) A partial solution has been completed for the original idea, and you want to close the original idea but continue to track portions of the original request (perhaps that showed up in comments) in a new idea.
More details to come as this functionality is delivered in the coming weeks.
Peter Flynn
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
After reviewing this idea, we’ve decided it’s not something we plan to implement at this time. Even though we are deferring this idea for now, it is still open to votes and comments. We do want to hear your opinion. Thank you for the feedback, and please, keep sharing!
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Flynn
shared this idea
·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Flynn
commented
Btw, it looks like this "add your own custom ignored words" request was suggested once before, but the UserVoice admins declined it with no explanation: https://feedback.uservoice.com/forums/1-general-feedback/suggestions/124647-stopwords-in-searches-specific-to-a-forum.
Admins: please, if you're going to decline a feature request a short comment explaining why or what the workaround / mitigation is would be really nice. My company makes of point of always doing that in our _own_ UserVoice instance...
An error occurred while saving the comment Peter Flynn
commented
Here's a related request: defining sets of product-specific terms that all mean the same thing, so prevent two users from filing the same suggestion twice using different names for the same feature. https://feedback.uservoice.com/forums/1-general-feedback/suggestions/15318363-custom-search-keyword-synonyms
Peter Flynn
supported this idea
·
-
108 votesPeter Flynn
supported this idea
·
There IS a way to still get to the old status messages btw, but it's not obvious or very efficient. Some views in the admin console - such as the Activity logs - still have links to the original issue A as a separate page. Even though the public URL for issue A just redirects to issue B now, the *admin* URL for issue A still gets you the original page with all the status updates intact (though it looks like any image attachments from users are missing). You'll see a note at the top of the admin view linking to the suggestion it has been merged into, but afaik that original page will continue to be accessible indefinitely.