Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Peter Flynn

My feedback

  1. 48 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  General Feedback » Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Peter Flynn supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  General Feedback » Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Deferred  ·  Claire Talbott responded

    After reviewing this idea, we’ve decided it’s not something we plan to implement at this time. Even though we are deferring this idea for now, it is still open to votes and comments. We do want to hear your opinion. Thank you for the feedback, and please, keep sharing!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Flynn commented  · 

    There IS a way to still get to the old status messages btw, but it's not obvious or very efficient. Some views in the admin console - such as the Activity logs - still have links to the original issue A as a separate page. Even though the public URL for issue A just redirects to issue B now, the *admin* URL for issue A still gets you the original page with all the status updates intact (though it looks like any image attachments from users are missing). You'll see a note at the top of the admin view linking to the suggestion it has been merged into, but afaik that original page will continue to be accessible indefinitely.

    Peter Flynn shared this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  General Feedback » Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Flynn commented  · 

    Btw, it looks like this "add your own custom ignored words" request was suggested once before, but the UserVoice admins declined it with no explanation: https://feedback.uservoice.com/forums/1-general-feedback/suggestions/124647-stopwords-in-searches-specific-to-a-forum.

    Admins: please, if you're going to decline a feature request a short comment explaining why or what the workaround / mitigation is would be really nice. My company makes of point of always doing that in our _own_ UserVoice instance...

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Flynn commented  · 

    Here's a related request: defining sets of product-specific terms that all mean the same thing, so prevent two users from filing the same suggestion twice using different names for the same feature. https://feedback.uservoice.com/forums/1-general-feedback/suggestions/15318363-custom-search-keyword-synonyms

    Peter Flynn supported this idea  · 
  4. 107 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  General Feedback » Integrations  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Peter Flynn supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base