 DForward@pcl.com
DForward@pcl.com
    
          
          
        My feedback
17 results found
- 
9 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
25 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·An error occurred while saving the comment  DForward@pcl.com
    
 commented DForward@pcl.com
    
 commentedI've been waiting for this for 7 years! 
- 
5 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
5 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
5 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  DForward@pcl.com
    
 commented DForward@pcl.com
    
 commentedWe need an exported list to be able to potentially follow up individually with users. Consider that we might want to copy/paste the respondent list to send them a direct email.  DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
5 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 shared this idea
         · DForward@pcl.com
    
 shared this idea
         ·
- 
3 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 shared this idea
         · DForward@pcl.com
    
 shared this idea
         ·
- 
3 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 shared this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 shared this idea
           ·
- 
3 votes
- 
5 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  DForward@pcl.com
    
 commented DForward@pcl.com
    
 commentedSimilar to how we connect Ideas to AZDO PBIs in Discovery, we would connect validation items to AZDO features in Validation. I like that it applies a tag and puts the URL in the comments.  DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
10 votesAn error occurred while saving the comment  DForward@pcl.com
    
 commented DForward@pcl.com
    
 commentedI actually think the current stages are adequate. 
- 
4 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·An error occurred while saving the comment  DForward@pcl.com
    
 commented DForward@pcl.com
    
 commentedI'm curious about this too. 
- 
26 votes
- 
48 votesWe’d love to hear what types of custom reports you’d like to have in UserVoice. Additionally, if you are creating custom reports outside of UserVoice as a workaround, please share. Thanks! 
- 
59 votes DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·
- 
282 votes
- 
8 votesHi Everyone! 👋 We have reviewed this idea, and it’s not something we plan to implement. Even though we are deferring this idea for now, it is still open to votes and comments. We do want to hear your opinion. Thank you for the feedback, and please, keep sharing!  DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           · DForward@pcl.com
    
 supported this idea
           ·

Need this so badly to integrate with modern workflows. At the bare minimum need it to read and search for feedback by description, category, forum, label and date range.
UserVoice is falling behind many other product capture tools (Canny - https://github.com/itsocialist/canny-mcp-server) Intercom (https://developers.intercom.com/docs/guides/mcp) without this.