General Feedback
How should we improve our feedback and product management tools?
We are listening and use this feedback to prioritize our roadmap!
88 results found
-
Add referral link for Linked Ideas without Feedback attached For linked ideas that have no feedback yet, there is no button to click to return to the original idea within the roadmap feature.
1 vote -
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
Change requirements of fields when creating a roadmap feature Owners can determine what field is required to be filled when admins are creating a roadmap feature.
1 vote -
Include relevant details from a location when a user reports a map issue! Include relevant details from a location when a user reports a map issue! -- Always someone asks us back what the street name was, the cross street info, and other information that we no longer have access to because it has been DAYS ago and we've moved on along down the road.
IF Waze included the details &/or allowed us to "see" what we reported - even a screenshot, we might be able to provide the information you ask. However, each time I am asked that - it is like - do we have photographic memory and /or esp? Because…
1 vote -
Convert Idea to a Feature It would be helpful if there was a quick way to convert an "Idea" into a "Feature" from the individual idea screen. We want to eliminate the manual steps of creating the feature separately and then linking an idea after the fact, it would be much faster for us to create "Features" directly from the idea level - or to put ideas directly onto the roadmap
6 votes -
Roadmap permissions I would like to be able to have restricted permission on the Roadmap so we can enable people to see it in the app but not have any edit permissions. Similar to what you can do with ideas.
2 votes -
6 votes
Hi Everyone,
We have reviewed this idea, and it’s not something we plan to implement. Even though we are deferring this idea for now, it is still open to votes and comments. We do want to hear your opinion. Thank you for the feedback, and please, keep sharing!
-
Add a ‘User interface’ or ‘General feedback’ Category as the categories provided are too restrictive I am posting this and other recent feedback ideas in ‘Roadmap’ not because they belong there, but because there is nowhere appropriate to put them!
2 votes -
Accessibility concerns: form inputs UserVoice uses the following markup pattern for its user idea inputs:
<label> <span class="uvFieldPlaceholder">Label text</span> <input> </label>
…which looks good at first glance until it becomes apparent that as soon as one starts typing in a field,
uvFieldPlaceholder
is hidden with display:none and is therefore inaccessible.Additionally, when editing a previously posted idea, the form <label>s containing the inputs have no text at all.
1 vote -
Rename Roadmap in admin console As an admin, I'd like an ability to rename Roadmap page in admin console. Currently we don't plan to share this Roadmap and tend to use it for only a limited amount of features. Our internal users get confused with word "Roadmap", since we use same word in our other applications. It would be great if I'll have ability to rename this page by myself in configuration. Another option is to simple rename this page to "Feature Board".
1 vote -
Make it possible to enter code in an idea description Even if it is not a majority use case for the kinds of products that UserVoice supports, there will be times when technical users want to add feedback that includes programming code.
It should be possible to receive and sanitise code just like StackExchange do…
<div> But it isn’t. <span>in a way that remains readable.</span> </div>
1 vote -
Poor usability of ‘Describe your idea’ textarea The ‘Describe your idea’ textarea is set at a height of 5em with
resize:none
. This is unhelpfully restrictive and makes entering anything more than 5 lines of text a complete pain.The simple solution is to remove
resize:none
or, if that is too great a stretch, useresize:vertical
instead.1 vote -
Accessibility/usability concerns: text styling This idea text manifests as light grey text (#87898F) on a white ground, which fails the minimum recommended contrast ratio.
Comments on ideas are rendered as 13px text on too long line lengths. The recommended base size for prose text is 16px or 1rem.
1 vote -
Share roadmap with a specific contributor team Provide the ability for Admins to specify which contributor group has access to view the roadmap from the contributor console instead of providing all contributors access.
1 vote -
Archive or Hide Roadmap Features We would like the ability to archive or hide roadmap features, specifically once those features have been completed and released. I know the "No Status" will not show up in the swimlanes but it would be great to either hide or have the ability to archive features that end up in our "Fully Launched" status (otherwise we'll eventually end up with a huge column of features)
4 votes -
improve Roadmap UI Improve the Roadmap UI for end users: 2 main issues:
1- the backend allows to add links for mockups or custom URL (pointing to a release note, etc.) but those are not visible to the front end users. Please make those fields visible to them otherwise what's the point?!
2- the Description field (also called Summary when then viewing a feature) should be rich text and allow to embed pictures - it makes the roadmap feature a lot better to engage front-end users.3 votes -
Roadmap search for contributor facing roadmap view as a end user, I want to search the roadmap (rather than only option being navigating the kanban or filtering by product area. as a end user I want to search (so it searches feature title and description)
4 votes -
roadmap filters let us filter the roadmap not just by product area and status but also by custom field that an admin would set (for example platforms, country, etc.)
3 votes -
Product Board Connection As I mentioned, we currently use Productboard for our roadmapping component. When we bought UV, we had hoped that the UV zap would be able to connect both tools so that we could get the best of both worlds.
Since the UV zap is depreciated, we haven't been able to connect those two systems. This often means that we might be working on features but it's not reflected in UV.
It's created a few challenges. Most notably, it makes it hard for customer-facing team to stay up to date with what's happening with their ideas.
I've been trying to think…
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?