Frank Goertzen
My feedback
16 results found
-
18 votes
Hi Everyone,
We have reviewed this idea, and it’s not something we plan to implement. Even though we are deferring this idea for now, it is still open to votes and comments. We do want to hear your opinion. Thank you for the feedback, and please, keep sharing!
An error occurred while saving the comment Frank Goertzen supported this idea · -
1 vote
-
1 voteFrank Goertzen shared this idea ·
-
5 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
9 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
Hi Everyone,
We have reviewed this idea, and it’s not something we plan to implement. Even though we are deferring this idea for now, it is still open to votes and comments. We do want to hear your opinion. Thank you for the feedback, and please, keep sharing!
Frank Goertzen supported this idea · -
56 votes
Hi All -
We're currently working on allowing users to split ideas apart. This will be useful in several cases:
(1) A user creates an idea that is really two separate things, and they should be tracked for interest accordingly.
(2) Your team seeks clarity on a couple of different interpretations of the idea, both of which could be good ideas.
(3) A partial solution has been completed for the original idea, and you want to close the original idea but continue to track portions of the original request (perhaps that showed up in comments) in a new idea.
More details to come as this functionality is delivered in the coming weeks.
Frank Goertzen supported this idea · -
65 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
75 votes
Hi everyone!
Thanks so much for your interest in this. We did start work on this for Helpdesk API, but our focus has since shifted to the UserVoice API.
After discussing internally, our product team wants to focus on building out our API documentation and endpoints to give more flexibility when building integrations.
So we are declining this idea. Have additions to our UserVoice API you would like to see? Let us know. And don’t forget to check out the UserVoice API as well here: https://developer.uservoice.com/docs/api/v2/reference/
Frank Goertzen supported this idea · -
88 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
82 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
124 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
290 votes
Hello 👋,
Thank you for your feedback on this idea.
We’ve recently introduced a 'Public (external)' share option for any Kanban style roadmap you create that allows for easy sharing of your roadmap in a public context. Visitors to the roadmap don't have to authenticate in order to view features across all statuses, filter by product area, explore additional feature details, or quickly access your web portal to leave further feedback.
Thanks again for your continued support.
Frank Goertzen supported this idea · -
1 voteFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
5 votesFrank Goertzen supported this idea ·
-
419 votes
Hey there! 👋
This week we released Custom Fields on ideas for internal use. This solves a problem for much of the feedback we received on this idea, but not all of it. We will keep this idea open for additional feedback and votes, but for those who were requesting better ways to organize ideas internally, we hope you enjoy our new release! You can read more about it here.
Frank Goertzen supported this idea ·
This is critical.
I realize this was deferred in Jun, but not having this feature severely reduces the usefulness of the the roadmap.
If enabling custom fields to appear on the roadmap isn't an option, then can we get at least 2 default fields?
1) URL
2) Date
Any updates on this feature would be appreciated.